PROLOG From One Who Was There Our worlds have changed a lot since the events I am about to describe took place. For those of you in the colonies, this may be the first full account you have received, and what little information that has trickled out your way is no doubt incomplete and inaccurate. Therefore it is only fair that you have some background of the days preceding. Only a few times each millennea are we blessed with the emergence of a truly genious mind. Newton, DaVinci, Edison, Einstein, Hawking. And Wright. Tacy Tiana Divine-Wright is well- known to every schoolchild as the Florence Nightingale of the 21st century for her humanitarian efforts during the Sundog disaster. But the scope of her intellectual achievements was largely erased by the heavy-handed purges of the Schism. Late in the 20th century, scientists began a massive effort to map the functions of the entire human DNA chain, known as the Human Genome Project. It took thirty years, and when it was done, human genetics held no more secrets. The capability existed to manipulate sex, eye color, height, size, though ethically that kind of manipulation was unofficially forbidden. Dr. Wright was interested in the medical possibilities opened up by this database. She believed that fetuses treated with the proper combination of RNA could result in a child immune to cancer, poor eyesight, alcoholism, and other genetic diseases. Together with Dr. Irene Gorse, she conducted this experiment on a test group, all of whom gave birth to totally healthy babies. The one unforseen factor was that every child, rather than being blue- or green-eyed, had yellow eyes. This was not considered a show- stopping problem, and many of the children in later years took to wearing colored contact lenses, which made them indistinguishable from non-genetically-enhanced people. Despite the eye color issue, the procedure was approved by the FDA, and quickly became common- -though voluntary-- prenatal treatment. Dr. Wright's discovery, however, was initially widely feared by those who felt that science was encroaching upon nature's domain. A handful of conservative senators introduced legislature that would ban genetic tampering, for medical reasons or otherwise. The measure failed to pass by a wide margin, but it was to become the spark which would later erupt into the Technological Schism. Meanwhile, Dr. Wright turned away from genetics and began work in neurology. Her mind had a way of seeing a scattering of seemingly unrelated components and finding a correlation between them. She said in interviews that she could discern no fundamental differences in any of the scientific fields. The brain is governed by the same rules of physics, chemistry, and physiology that govern molecular genetics, she said, and this enabled her to understand how any part of the body works and interrelates. But it was when she combined her work with that of her husband, the roboticist Norman Greer, that she invented something incredible. The neural pathways, she knew, are merely pulses of minute eletrical current. And the regions of the brain had been mostly identified by function. As was her want, Tacy took what was known and went deeper. She turned her husband into a colleague to take advantage of an experimental robot brain he had been working on. He wanted a robot that needed to be programmed only once, that would receive any further instructions either by being told, or by inference. His computer had the ability, like Tacy's mind, to find relationships and fill in the blanks. Unlike other computers before it, Greer's was able to determine which possible relationships either did not apply or would be a bad choice for the situation. Greer, Tacy, and several volunteer test subjects spent weeks wearing motorcycle helmets modified into miniature MRIs. The helmets were tethered to computer packs clipped to their belts that wirelessly transmitted the data to Greer's Relationship and Intelligence-Gathering Station, which he called RIGS. Finally, after six months of collecting data, and another five years analyzing it, Tacy announced that she was able to translate synaptical impulses into machine code. (Wright's original announcement used the term "binary code". However, we have since learned that the word "binary" was still being used archaically at that time to mean any computer language. True binary code--consisting of only two digits: zero and one--had long fallen by the wayside, replaced by faster, more concise four- , eight- and sixteen-digit code read in a non-linear fashion by parallel processor buses. Greer's code was, in fact, octant. Readers who would like to know more about Norman Greer are invited to read Appendix iv of Richard Claythorne's textbook "Analytical Computing Solutions," which gives samples of Greer's RIGS code, plus examination of an early pentameter language that Greer based on Chinese ideogram structure). The results of this study was a device Wright called a "knowledge chip". Little is known about this device other than it was a circuit implanted on the cerebral cortex, capable of taking input from an outside source and translating that to synaptic signals. The history of the knowlege chip is cloudy, because at about this time, Wright lost support of her employer, the Hellmann Medical Institute, and federal grant support. The reason for this is unclear. Wright disappeared from the public record shortly after. This was the dawn of the Technological Schism. A conservative branch of the government that had been steadily growing for three decades found one of its own elected president: Sidahone Marzollo. Marzollo set up a commission to look at new technologies and determine whether they were beneficial or detrimental to society. Knowlege chips and prenatal genetic alterations were stamped detrimental, and the commision exercised its most controvertial power: the autonomous ability to enact laws banning research and development of whatever the commission deemed detrimental. The majority of Wright's work was destroyed and her research removed from public access. The work of the commission became known as the Technological Schism; some have called it the beginning of the second Dark Age. --Marisa Geneaux Oro Riviera, San Padre III 41 May 2404